MANAGEMENT OF CIVILIAN COLON INJURIES
|Full paper||Not Available|
Over the past three decades. primary repair of colonic injuries has become more accepted and there has been a trend toward using this procedure for repairing civilian colonic injures. However, the best procedure remains controversial. Forty patients with colonic injuries alone or associated with other organ injuries were included in the present study over a 44 months period Benha University HospitaL After resuscitation. exploratory laparotorny was done and other organ injuries were appropriately managed. Colonic injuries were dealt with either by primary repair. age. blood transfusion. mechanism and site of injury and injury severity indices. The mechanism of injury was stab injury in 37.596 gunshout in 32.5% iatrogenic in I 7"6 and blunt trauma in 13%. Isolated colon injuries were found in 27.5% and associated with small intestinal injury in 47%. The left colon injuries were found in 40% followed by transverse colon in 37.5%. Primary repair either by debridement and simple closure in 2 layers or by segmental resection and primary anastomosis was done in 65% of patients while diversion procedures were carried out for 35% of patients. There were 3 mortalities (and complications occurred in 30% of the studied patients. From this study we can conclude that there is no single policy _for management of colon injuries either by diversion or primary repair. Good results can be obtained by proper decision of an experienced surgeon according to the individual circumstances of each case rather than following solid scheme by less experienced surge Primary suture should be limited to early cases induced by sharp agents or iatrogenic injury. For most severely traumatized patients diversion remains the most dependable method of treatment as it is followed by the least morbidity and mortality.