Background
Ultrasound imaging of the spine has recently been proposed to facilitate identification of
the anatomic landmarks for subarachnoid blockade. This study assessed the accuracy and
precision of the ultrasound-guided subarachnoid blockade over the conventional surface
landmark-guided technique in patients with difficult surface anatomic landmarks undergoing
elective orthopedic lower limb surgery.
Patients and methods
This prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 patients with difficult
surface anatomic landmarks for subarachnoid block, scheduled for elective orthopedic lower
limb surgery. These patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: group LM in
which subarachnoid block was performed using the conventional surface landmark-guided
technique and group US in which subarachnoid block was performed using the ultrasound.
The primary outcome was the rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion
attempt. The secondary outcomes included number of needle redirection, number of repeated
needle insertion, number of failed attempts, time taken to establish landmarks, and time taken
to perform the spinal anesthesia.
Results
Successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt was achieved in 21 (70%) patients
in group US and in eight (26.7%) patients in group LM (P < 0.001), whereas the number of patients
requiring needle redirection in group US was seven (23.3%), which was significantly less than in
group LM in which half of the patients required needle redirection after the first insertion of the
needle. The number of patients requiring repeated needle insertions in group LM was three-fold
the number of patients in group US [six (20%) vs. two (6.7%), respectively]. There was only one
failed attempt in group LM. The mean time taken to establish anatomic landmarks was highly
significantly longer in group US than in group LM (5.7 ± 0.93 vs. 2.27 ± 1.23 min, respectively;
P < 0.001). There was a highly significant reduction in the time required to perform the spinal
anesthesia in group US (5.01 ± 0.78 min) than in group LM (7.75 ± 0.96 min; P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Ultrasound-guided approach is a reliable and effective method in patients in whom technical
difficulty is expected. |
