You are in:Home/Publications/Comparative Study between using Lowenstein Jensen, Bio-FM media and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System in Identification of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Prof. Amal Mohammed Mohammed Saeed :: Publications:

Title:
Comparative Study between using Lowenstein Jensen, Bio-FM media and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System in Identification of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
Authors: Amal M. Saeed¹, Nehad A. Fouad¹ and Tarek S. Essawy2
Year: 2012
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiolog
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background/Aim Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be one of the most important infectious diseases threatening the human health. Culture systems are used for isolation of tuberculous bacilli as they are more sensitive than smear microscopy. The Aim of the work was to evaluate the detection rate and time of mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the Bio FM system and mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) system in comparison with the Lowenstein-Jensen medium. Methods: This study was carried out on a total 60 smear acid fast bacilli positive sputum samples obtained from patients attending Chest Department and Outpatient Clinic of Benha University Hospital, Benha Chest Hospital, from June 2011 to September of the same year. Patients were classified into three groups: Group I: included 40 patients with fresh sputum smear +ve (new cases) Group II: included 13 relapsed cases and Group III: included 7 treatment failure cases. All sputum samples were cultured in parallel on Bio-FM, MGIT and LJ media. The mycobacterial detection rate and time were compared. Results: The mycobacteria recovery rate on MGIT, Bio- FM and LJ were not significantly different (respectively 98.3%, 95% and 93 %, P > 0.05). The growth of M. tuberculosi was faster on MGIT then on Bio-FM (mean 10.7±2.9 days, 11.1±4.3 days respectively vs. 23.6±8.1 days for LJ, there was statistically significant difference between L.J and Bio-FM and L.J and MGIT, However there was no statistically significant when comparing MGIT and Bio-FM. In conclusion: MGIT, BioFM media were better than LJ medium in recovery rate and detection time of mycobacterial growth.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus