You are in:Home/Publications/EXTRAPLEURAL VERSUS EPIDURAL CATHETER TECHNIQUES EMPLOYING ROPIVACAINE ANALGESIA FOR POST-THORACOTOMY PAIN RELIEF

Dr. hatem.kaied :: Publications:

Title:
EXTRAPLEURAL VERSUS EPIDURAL CATHETER TECHNIQUES EMPLOYING ROPIVACAINE ANALGESIA FOR POST-THORACOTOMY PAIN RELIEF
Authors: Mahmoud El-Emam MD, Hatem S. Kayed MD* and Sarnir EL-Sayed MD*
Year: 2016
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper hatem.kaied_it.docx
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the long acting local anesthetic (0.25% ropivacaine) intermittently administered through an extrapleural paravertebral catheter versus a thoracic epidural catheter on postthoracotomy pain relief Patients and Methods: Forty patients undergoing elective posterolateral thoracotomy during the period between July 2001 and August 2002 were prospectively studied. They were randomly allocated into two groUps (A and B) of 20 patients each. Group A patients received an epidural- type catheter inserted by the surgeon into art extrapleural pocket extending for 2 to 3 intercostal spaces both above and below the thoracotomy incision alongside the vertebral column by the conclusion of operation. A bolus dose of 15 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine analgesia was given during chest closure. Group B patients received a thoracic epidural catheter inserted by the anesthesiologist at T5-6 or T6-7 interspace before induction of anesthesia. A bolus dose of 15 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine analgesia Was given after confirming the correct position of the epidural catheter. Postoperatively, patients in both groups were intermittently administered 25 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine analgesia at 6 hourly intervals for 3 successive days. Pain scores (verbal rating scale), requirement of additional analgesia (P/SAID), pulmonary function test, shoulder range of motion as well as any complication encountered were assessed and compared in both groups

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus