You are in:Home/Publications/Regional analysis of Endothelium/Descemet’s thickness in active corneal graft rejection

Dr. Taher kamel Eleiwa :: Publications:

Title:
Regional analysis of Endothelium/Descemet’s thickness in active corneal graft rejection
Authors: Taher Kamel Eleiwa, Amr Elsawy, Vatookarn Roongpoovapatr, Mohamed Abou Shousha
Year: 2019
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Volume: 60
Issue: 9
Pages: 2134-2134
Publisher: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Purpose : To evaluate the utility of regional Endothelium/Descemet’s complex (En/DM) thickness (rDMT) in the diagnosis of active corneal graft rejection. Methods : Thirty-six eyes (24 corneal grafts; 12 clear grafts and 12 with active rejection, along with 12 age-matched control eyes) were imaged using high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT; Envisu R2210, Bioptigen, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) with 6 mm radial cuts centered on the corneal vertex. Custom-made segmentation algorithm was used to segment the En/DM, and 6 mm bullseye maps were created and divided into three regions; central, paracentral and peripheral (Fig. 1). The mean thickness of each region was calculated. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons were performed to compare the means of central, paracentral, and peripheral rDMTs between the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the central, paracentral, and peripheral rDMTs in differentiating between the studied groups (Fig. 2). Results : The mean central rDMTs for the control, clear, and active rejection groups were (10, 12, and 28 µm, respectively), the mean paracentral rDMTs were (11,16, and 29 µm, respectively), and the mean peripheral rDMTs were (14, 19, and 37 µm, respectively). The mean central, paracentral, and peripheral rDMTs were significantly higher in the active rejection group than both the control, and clear groups (p

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus