You are in:Home/Publications/Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Evaluation of its provocative clinical tests

Dr. Mohamed mohsen baioumy elmaghraby :: Publications:

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Evaluation of its provocative clinical tests
Authors: Ahmed A. Arab, Mohamed M. Elmaghrabi and Mohamed H. Eltantawy
Year: 2017
Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome, arm raising test, provocative tests.
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Mohamed mohsen baioumy elmaghraby_CTS manuscript 2.docx
Supplementary materials Not Available

Background: The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is established mainly on clinical basis, and diagnosis is done after careful history taking and examination including known provocative tests with varying efficacy and reliability. Objective: A trial to compare Arm raising test (ART) to commonly used provocative tests, and to confirm its reliability in diagnosing CTS. Patients and methods: a prospective clinical study of 123 patients with 171 hands were presenting with classical symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were included in this study, from October 2013 to October 2015, and they underwent open surgical release of flexor retinaculum at the Neurosurgery Department of Benha University Hospital. Results: ART is positive in 88.3%. This is compared to 75% , 81.3%, 79.7%, 83.6% of positive results in Tinel's, compression, Phalen's, and combined Phalen's and compression. ART is the most sensitive and specific test, and has the highest positive predictive value of 98.3%, negative predictive value 81.9% and accuracy 91.4%. Conclusion: ART is a simple, reliable, and easily performed test for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome; it is superior to other tests and could be used also to assess improvement after surgery.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus