You are in:Home/Publications/Efect of platelet-rich plasma on recurrence of sinonasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Assist. Ahmed Abd-elrahman Ibraheem Elnagdy :: Publications:

Title:
Efect of platelet-rich plasma on recurrence of sinonasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial
Authors: Alaa Mohamed Abd El Samiea1 , Ahmed Soliman Elkady1 , Ahmed Abdelrahman Ibrahim Elnagdy1* and Abdelhakim Foaad Ghallab1
Year: 2025
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Ahmed Abd-elrahman Ibraheem Elnagdy_My peper.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a persistent infammatory condition that often requires surgical intervention. Despite advances in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), recurrence rates remain signifcant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), known for its regenerative properties, has been suggested to reduce infammation and promote healing. Methodology This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out on 40 patients which aims to evaluate the efectiveness of PRP in reducing the recurrence and healing of sinonasal polyps after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) after 6 months follow-up. Patients aged over 18 years and under 60 years old, with more than 3 months of CRS symptoms with endoscopic evidence of polyps and/or mucosal changes on a CT scan were included in our study. Previous sinus surgery, systemic vasculitis, immune defciency, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases or coagulopathy, history of asthma, aspirin sensitivity, cystic fbrosis, and congenital mucociliary problems were excluded from our study. Results Both groups showed improvement in Lund-Kennedy scores and SNOT-22 scores postoperatively. However, Group 1 demonstrated signifcantly greater improvement at 3 months (median Lund-Kennedy score: 4.0 vs. 6.0, p

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus