You are in:Home/Publications/Technical Ultrasound and Color Doppler Errors in Assessment of Internal Jugular Vein

Dr. Enas Mohamed Moustafa Sweed :: Publications:

Title:
Technical Ultrasound and Color Doppler Errors in Assessment of Internal Jugular Vein
Authors: Hesham El-Sayed EL- Sheikh, Esraa Nasr El Din Ibrahim, Enas Mohammed Sweed
Year: 2023
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Enas Mohamed Moustafa Sweed_5-IJV.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: The internal jugular vein (IJV) is widely used to assess the jugular venous pressure. One can roughly estimate the pressure in the right atrium by looking at the pulsations and their height in the IJV. The aim of this work was to assess technical ultrasound and color Doppler errors in assessment of IJV by comparing sonographic parameters with those obtained from other imaging examination like CT. Methods: This prospective study was carried out on patients with CT for pathological neck lesions and normal IJV who came for CT examination of the neck for different pathological lesions not related to disease in jugular vein. All patients were subjected to clinical examination and ultrasound and color doppler examination of IJV. Results: The interclass agreement coefficient between AP diameter of RT IJV (supine position) by CT and by U/S is 0.919 (CI: 0.847-0.957) with significant value (p< 0.001). Also, the interclass agreement coefficient between AP diameter of LT IJV (supine position) by CT and by U/S is 0.984 (CI: 0.969-0.991) with significant value (p< 0.001). Conclusions: technical ultrasound errors in assessment of internal jugular vein can lead to errors in the results, erroneous diagnosis of pseudotumor or developmental anomaly. Measuring anteroposterior diameter of right and left IJV while patient is either in a supine position with Valsalva maneuver or while sitting give inaccurate results when compared with CT measurements as a gold standard method for measurement.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus