You are in:Home/Publications/Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Controversy of Diagnosis and Management

Assist. Mohamed Emad El-deen Ibrahim Mohamed :: Publications:

Title:
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Controversy of Diagnosis and Management
Authors: Mohamed E. El-Hawary, Waleed B. Sharshera, Ahmed M. Nabil, Mohamed E. Mohamed, Baher M. El-Toukhy
Year: 2025
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Mohamed Emad El-deen Ibrahim Mohamed_BMFJ3935441732485600.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a chronic steadily progressing disease, characterized by an expansion of the ventricles of the brain with normal (ICP). The aim of this study was to study the importance of completing the clinical triad in the diagnosis, clarify the rule of MRI Flowmetry in the decision of V-P shunt insertion in patients with NPH Methods: This study has been done on 25 patients who were suspected to have (iNPH). Patients were divided into two groups; group A included 12 patients with stroke volume above 42 microliter/cycle in MRCSF Fflowmetry and group B included 13 patients with stroke volume below 42 microliter/cycle. These patients have been subjected to clinical examination, radiological, and laboratory investigations. Results: There is a highly statistical significance between these two items as following; Dementia: All cases improved after tapping (11 cases), improved after shunting and 12 cases out of 14 did not show improvement in the test and shunting with a highly significant P value, Gait disturbance: 11 cases improved after tapping in comparison to 10 cases improved after shunting and 13 cases out of 14 did not show improvement in the test and shunting with a significant P value. Urinary incontinence: 11 cases improved after tapping in comparison to 13 cases improved after shunting and 11 cases out of 14 did not show improvement in the test and shunting with a highly significant P value. Conclusions: CSF Tapping and clinical FU after tapping is the most important test in the decision of shunting.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus