You are in:Home/Publications/The Swashbuckler Approach for AO Type C Distal Femoral Fractures

Assist. Mohamed Fathi Rashed Mahmoud Abdel-Razek :: Publications:

Title:
The Swashbuckler Approach for AO Type C Distal Femoral Fractures
Authors: MF Rashed, MA Moselhy, KS Khater Benha Medical Journal
Year: 2026
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Mohamed Fathi Rashed Mahmoud Abdel-Razek_dr.rashed review-2.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Distal femoral fractures account for 5%–7% of adult long-bone injuries and present significant treatment challenges due to comminution, soft-tissue damage, and the need for precise articular reconstruction. The Swashbuckler approach—an anterolateral, quadriceps-sparing exposure—offers broad visualization of both femoral condyles while preserving future arthroplasty planes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the functional, radiological, and complication outcomes of the Swashbuckler approach in adult AO/OTA Type C distal femoral fractures, and to compare these outcomes with those reported for alternative surgical exposures. A comprehensive search of eight databases and grey literature sources was conducted from 2015 to 2025. Studies were included if they involved patients aged ≥16 years with AO/OTA 33-C1 to C3 fractures treated via Swashbuckler or mini-Swashbuckler approach using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), with reported quantitative outcomes. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, with a mean patient age of 39.0 years and 69.1% being male. AO Type C2 and C3 fractures comprised 67.5% of cases. Union was achieved in 98.9% of patients by an average of 17.2 weeks. Functional outcomes were excellent or good in 66.5% of cases, with a mean Knee Society Score of 83.7 ± 11.9. The overall complication rate was 12.9%, most commonly superficial infection (5.7%) and knee stiffness (4.1%). One comparative study showed superior range of motion and Neer scores for the Swashbuckler approach versus standard lateral exposure. Although most evidence is Level III, the Swashbuckler approach appears to offer reliable union, acceptable complications, and favorable functional outcomes, particularly in complex fractures.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus