You are in:Home/Publications/Evaluation of the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) as a prognostic tool in cases of tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy

Dr. Abdel-Hakim Fouad Elwany :: Publications:

Title:
Evaluation of the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) as a prognostic tool in cases of tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy
Authors: Abd Elhakim Fouad Ghallab1,2, Ahmed Soliman Elkady1,2, Ahmed El‑Sayed Fathy Salman1,2* and Eslam Farid Abu Shady
Year: 2026
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Abdel-Hakim Fouad Elwany_8.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is a long-standing inflammation of the middle ear mucosa characterized by tympanic membrane perforation and persistent or intermittent otorrhea (discharge lasting a mini‑ mum of 2–6 weeks). Our study aimed to assess the middle ear risk index as a prognostic tool in tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy cases. Methods This single-center prospective observational study was performed at a tertiary care center from May 2024 to May 2025 comprising 60 patients with non-complicated safe CSOM candidate for post-auricular canal wall-up (CWU) tympanomastoidectomy through a post-auricular approach. Patients were assigned according to Austin-Kar‑ tush classification. All patients underwent multislice CT scan and pure tone audiometry (PTA). Results Hearing improvement was achieved in 39 (65%) patients, and successful graft uptake occurred in 45 (75%). Higher MERI scores were associated with poorer postoperative hearing outcomes. Spearman correlation demon‑ strated a significant negative association between MERI score and hearing improvement (r=− 0.385, p=0.002). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, MERI score emerged as the only independent predictor of hearing improve‑ ment (OR=0.600, 95% CI: 0.370–0.990, p=0.048). Conclusions Elevated MERI scores were significantly associated with unfavorable anatomical and functional out‑ comes, whereas lower scores correlated with successful graft uptake and greater hearing improvement.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus