You are in:Home/Publications/Abbas, H.H., Abuzaid, A.S., Jahin, H.S. and Kasim, D.S. 2020. Assessing the quality of untraditional water sources for irrigation purposes in Al-Qalubiya Governorate, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 60 (2): 157 – 166. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2020.24569.1343

Prof. Ahmed Saeed Fathi Yousef Abuzaid :: Publications:

Title:
Abbas, H.H., Abuzaid, A.S., Jahin, H.S. and Kasim, D.S. 2020. Assessing the quality of untraditional water sources for irrigation purposes in Al-Qalubiya Governorate, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 60 (2): 157 – 166. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2020.24569.1343
Authors: Hassan H. Abbas, Ahmed S. Abuzaid*, Hossam S. Jahin, Diaa S. Kasem
Year: 2020
Keywords: Agricultural drainage water; Wastewater; Water quality; Al-Qalubiya Governorate
Journal: Egyptian Journal of Soil Science
Volume: 60
Issue: 2
Pages: 157-166
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Ahmed Saeed Fathi Yousef Abuzaid_Assessing The Quality of Untraditional Water Sources for Irrigation Purposes in Al-Qalubiya Governorate, Egypt.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

LIMITED freshwater coupled with the ever-growing population has forced the farmers in Egypt to reuse untraditional water sources for irrigation purposes. However, a precise evaluation of such water quality is necessarytoavoid potential risks. The current work aimed at verifying the potentiality of reusing agricultural drainage water (ADW) and mixed wastewater (MWW) for irrigation in Al-Qalubiya Governorate. The study based on the considerations set by FAO 29 and 47 guidelines besides the Egyptian code of practice (ECP 501/2015) for wastewater reuse for irrigation. Twenty water samples were collected along Sindwa drain (agricultural drainage water) and Shibin El-Qanater drain (mixed wastewater), ten samples from each. Another ten samples of the Nile freshwater (NFW) were collected nearby the previously water samples from El-Sharaqua canal. The three different locations of sample collection sites showed variable ranges of pH, dissolved and suspended solids, soluble ions, and trace elements. However, they were generally lower than the maximum allowable limits set by FAO guidelines and ECP 501/2015, except NO3– and Mn in the ADW. On the other hand, the fecal coliforms in the ADW and MWW were beyond the safe limits. Based on the ECP 501/2015 the NFW isrecommended for irrigating crops of Group B (e.g. dry cereal crops and cooked and processed vegetables, fruit crops and medicinal plants), while the ADW and MWW arerecommended for crops of Group D (e.g. bio-charcoal crops, bio-diesel fuel crops, cellulose production crops, and timber trees).

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus