You are in:Home/Publications/The Relationship between Neck Size of the Cerebral Saccular Aneurysms and Outcome after Endovascular Intervention

Dr. Ahmed abdelhafez ali arab :: Publications:

Title:
The Relationship between Neck Size of the Cerebral Saccular Aneurysms and Outcome after Endovascular Intervention
Authors: AHMED M. DEABES, M.Sc.; FATHY H. EL-NOSS, M.D.; HOSSAM I. MAATY, M.D.; AHMED A. ARAB, M.D. and MOHAMED N. SHADAD, M.D.
Year: 2018
Keywords: Key Words: Intracranial aneurysms – Endovascular intervention – Aspect ratio – Neck size.
Journal: Medical Journal of Cairo university
Volume: 86
Issue: 16
Pages: 4689 - 4698
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link:
Full paper Ahmed abdelhafez ali arab_1st research.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: Intracranial aneurysms are common with a prevalence of 0.2% to 9% in adults. Intracranial aneurysms have high mortality and morbidity, so exclusion of aneurysms from cerebral circulation is aimed with established endovascular embolization. Aim of Study: Is to report our experience in managing intracranial aneurysms using coil embolization and to report the relation between neck size of cerebral aneurysms, its relation to dome height which is defined as Aspect Ratio (AR), and clinical, angiographic outcome after endovascular intervention. Patients and Methods: From July 2015 to May 2017, a series of 40 nonrandomized consecutive patients (mean age: 44.2± 14.9 years) with 42 intracranial aneurysms underwent endovascular coil embolization in our center. We excluded patients with H & H grade 5 on admission and patients with H & H grade 4 were managed conservatively until improvement with better H&H grade. All patients were evaluated by four-vessel angiography to determine the shape, size, number and location of the aneurysms. Degree of aneurysm occlusion were assessed according to modified Raymond Roy classification. The cases were divided according to neck size, 4mm being the discriminative value for small and wide necks and divided according to aspect ratio into AR >2, AR 1.5-2, AR 1-1.5, AR 1.5 with modified Raymond classification are; class I was achieved in 22 (68.8%) aneurysms, class II in 8 (25%) aneurysms, class IIIa in one (3.1%) aneurysm, class IIIb in one (3.1%) aneurysm. The wide necked group and AR 1.5, but in aneurysms with wide neck and AR

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus