You are in:Home/Publications/Parametric study and optimization of a solar chimney passive ventilation system coupled with an earth-to-air heat exchanger

Dr. ahmed A. Serageldin :: Publications:

Title:
Parametric study and optimization of a solar chimney passive ventilation system coupled with an earth-to-air heat exchanger
Authors: Ahmed A. Serageldin, AK Abdelrahman, S Ookawara
Year: 2018
Keywords: Earth-air heat exchangerSolar chimneyParametric studyNumerical simulationOptimization
Journal: Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Volume: 30
Issue: Not Available
Pages: 263-278
Publisher: Elsevier
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

A parametric analysis and optimization method for passive heating and ventilation systems are developed, using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) ANSYS design exploration and optimization tool. Moreover, a three-dimensional, quasi-steady CFD Fluent simulation is performed and validated against experimental results. For comparison, the thermal performance of a small-scale wooden room fitted with a solar chimney and an earth-to-air heat exchanger (EAHE) was experimentally evaluated in the cold season in Egypt, in March 14–22, 2016. A good agreement has been found between the experimental and simulated results, with error, correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination average values of 7.3%, 96.5%, and 94%, respectively. Moreover, a parametric study is conducted to maximize the ventilation rate, using eight parameters for solar chimney configuration (width, length, air gap, inclination angle, and position) and EAHE design (pipe diameter, inlet position, and inlet height). It is found that the EAHE pipe diameter is the most sensitive parameter, followed by chimney height, and EAHE inlet height and position; the solar chimney inclination angle, width, and gap have also noticeable impacts. The optimum chimney inclination angle, length, width, and gap ranges are 30–35°, 1.94–1.97 m, 0.92–0.97 m, and 0.19–0.23 m, respectively

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus