You are in:Home/Publications/Evaluation of Bone Fusion and Clinical Outcome of a Stand-Alone Polyether Ether Ketone Cage Filled with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Used in One Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Prof. Ashraf El- Desuky El- Tantawy :: Publications:

Title:
Evaluation of Bone Fusion and Clinical Outcome of a Stand-Alone Polyether Ether Ketone Cage Filled with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Used in One Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Authors: Ashraf El-Desouky, MD, Mohammed Hammad Eltantawy, MD, Ahmed A. Arab, MD
Year: 2021
Keywords: Anterior cervical discectomy; PEEK cage; Biphasic calcium phosphate
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Ashraf El- Desuky El- Tantawy_final version ACDF accepted for publication.docx
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background; Although autologous bone grafts harvested from iliac crest were used since the early days of ACDF, they caused donor site morbidities. PEEK cages used in cervical spine surgeries on a wide scale with controversy of their filling material. This study is to evaluate bone fusion and clinical outcome of one level ACDF using stand-alone PEEK cage filled with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate granules in treatment of degenerative CDD Methods: A prospective study, where patients with single level degenerative CDD, underwent ACDF using our technique from April 2017 to April 2019 with one year follow up. Preoperative and one-year postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck pain and arm pain assessed. One-year postoperative Odom clinical outcome scoring system, Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI) and bone fusion assessed. Bone fusion considered successful if bridging bone incorporating graft and adjoining vertebral endplates was apparent. Results: 19 patients included, 14 female patients (73.68%) and 5 male patients (26.32%). The preoperative mean VAS for neck pain and arm pain improved from 7.37±1.74 and7.96 ±1.24 to 2.95±1.27 and 2.21 ±1.01 respectively. This difference found statistically significant. According to Odom scoring system, 15 patients (78.95%) had excellent outcome and 4 patients (21.05%) had good outcome and by using PSI, 16 patients (84.21%) were grade 1 and 3 patients (15.79%) were grade 2. 17 patients (89.47 %) showed bone fusion, while 2 patients (10.53 %) showed non-union. Conclusion: we found our technique safe and effective alternative with bone fusion and clinical outcome comparable to those of other options.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus