Objective
The aim of this study was to evaluate the competency and safety of surgical
management of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) through laparoscopic
cholecystectomy (LC) within and after 72 h of symptom onset. We are reviewing
our experience by comparing the outcomes of both ways to carry out an ideal
therapeutic strategy used for ACC.
Background
ACC is a very frequent surgical insult. The timing of surgery in the management of
such condition is a subject of controversy among all surgeons. In this study, we tried
to share in solving this conflict to implement the optimal timing of LC for ACC.
Patients and methods
The study includes 100 patients with ACC, divided according to the timing of LC into
group E(50 patients), operated within 72 h of symptom onset and group L (50 patients),
operated beyond 72 h of symptom onset. Patients in both groups monitored since
admission, during operations, and along the postoperative (PO) period. The data
collected include demographic data, clinical data, duration of symptoms before
surgery, coexisting disease, laboratory and image results, operative data, PO
complications, the length of stay in ICU and the total length of hospitalization.
Results
Fever and Murphy’s sign were significantly greater in the early LC group. Initial total
bilirubin and blood urea nitrogen are significantly higher (P=0.032 and 0.004,
respectively) among the late LC group. The operative time and mean total
hospital stay are significantly higher (P=0.005 and 0.010, respectively) in the
late LC group compared with the early LC group. The rates of PO bile leakage
and port-site infections were higher among patients of late LC group.
Conclusion
Emergent LC is a safe and reliable procedure for ACC within 72 h of symptom onset.
Regarding the PO outcomes, financial costs and length of hospital stay, it is more
helpful than LC beyond 72 h. |
