You are in:Home/Publications/Comparing longevity traits in four maternal lines of rabbits

Dr. Ayman Gamal Fawzy EL Nagar :: Publications:

Title:
Comparing longevity traits in four maternal lines of rabbits
Authors: Ayman Gamal Fawzy EL Nagar
Year: 2011
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Ayman Gamal Fawzy El-Nagar_TesinaMaster_AymanGamal.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

This study was conducted in four Spanish maternal lines of rabbits (A, V, H and LP) reared in the closed nucleus of selection located in the farm of the Department of Animal Science, Polytechnic University of Valencia. Data for this study were collected during the program of selection of maternal lines of rabbits from September 1980 to March 2011. The main objective of this work was to compare the longevity trait in four maternal lines of rabbits (A, V, H and LP) selected for litter size at weaning but founded on different criteria. The comparison has been done at their foundation time using the complete pedigree file and the complete data set performed from their foundation until March, 2011. The second objective of this study was to compare the lines at fixed times. The fixed times of comparison were from March, 1997 to September 1998 for A, V and H lines, and from September, 2009 to March, 2011 for A, V and LP lines. The results of the present study could be summarized as follows: 1- The estimated additive genetic variance of longevity resulted from the use of the complete data set (12693 does and 14805 record in the pedigree file), and the complete genetic model was 0.195 with standard deviation of 0.03. This estimate corresponds to an effective heritability of 0.163, while corresponds to an equivalent heritability of 0.104 considering the proportion of uncensored data as 59.57 % of the whole data set. 2- Regarding the comparison of longevity between the lines A, V, H, and LP at their foundation using the complete genetic model and the complete data set from the foundation of the four lines until March, 2011. The lines V, H and LP showed a significant superiority over line A. The greatest difference was between the lines A and LP, while the differences between line V and both of H and LP lines were small and non significant. These differences between lines may be attributed to the history of foundation of each line where all of them were founded on different criteria but all selected for litter size at weaning. 3- Regarding the comparison between lines at fixed times, the first comparison was between lines A, V, and H and the selected data were performed during the period from March, 1997 to September, 1998. It is shown that line A had a risk of culling or death greater than lines V and H. the same trend as in the case of the comparison at the foundation time of these lines, while the differences between lines V and H were non significant. The second comparison was between lines A, V, and LP and the selected data set were performed during the period from September, 2009 to March, 2011. This comparison reflects the current situation of these three lines, it is shown the inferiority of the line A over the two other lines (the same trend as the anterior comparison), this means lower longevity of line A which had limited capacity to face the opposite risk factors. No significant difference between the V and LP lines has been founded. 4- The observed differences between lines during these periods were much lower than those at the foundation time due to in part to the main cause of these differences in the genetic level of the contemporary animals compared to the founders. - Given the expected differences between lines at the two fixed times that computed using the complete genetic model (which included the additive genetic value of animals), showing that the observed and expected values of the hazard are relatively similar. This means that the complete model used in the analysis was suitable to describe this longevity data set.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus