You are in:Home/Publications/Versatility of unilateral propeller groin flap for coverage of large scrotal defects and its impact on testicular function

Prof. Ayman Mahmoud Abdel Mofeed Hassan :: Publications:

Title:
Versatility of unilateral propeller groin flap for coverage of large scrotal defects and its impact on testicular function
Authors: Mohamed T. Younes , Ayman M. Abdelmofeed , Ola Seif , Mohamed H. Abdelhalim
Year: 2022
Keywords: Key Words: scrotal reconstruction – groin flap –propeller flap – testicular functions
Journal: JPRAS Open
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Ayman Mahmoud Abdel Mofeed Hassan_groin paper.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

ABSTRACT Background: There are many options for scrotal reconstruction, each having its own benefits and drawbacks. In the last years, the introduction of the propeller flaps gained great popularity, while the use of groin flap as propeller in scrotal reconstruction remains anecdotal, with only a few cases reported in literature. 2 Objectives: In this research we study the versatility of unilateral propeller groin flaps in the reconstruction of large scrotal defects. Patients and Methods: This study was done on 10 patients with scrotal defects who were admitted to the plastic unit of the general surgery department at Benha university hospital from 2019 to 2021 for scrotal reconstruction. Results: All surgeries were successful with a mean operative time of 301.5 minutes, ranging from 90 to 130 minutes. All flaps survived well with no flap necrosis, and only one case showed flap congestion. Donor site healed well with the scar hidden in a natural crease, with no affection on the testicular functions. Conclusions: The use of groin flap as a propeller; allows for free movement and rotation of the flap, which allows for better coverage of a large scrotal defect with good vascularity, lesser complications, no need for further operations to separate the pedicle, and has the lowest donor site morbidity.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus