You are in:Home/Publications/Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Myocardial Reperfusion and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Coronary Intervention

Dr. Eman Said Mohamed Hassan :: Publications:

Title:
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Myocardial Reperfusion and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Coronary Intervention
Authors: Khaled Emad El din Elrabat1, Eman Saeed Elkeshk1, MohamedHelmy Elsayed2, Shereen Ibrahim Farag1 and Mohamed MousaOkda2*
Year: 2018
Keywords: Micro vascular reperfusion; Coronary intervention; Cardiovascular mortality; Electrocardiographic STR
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Eman Said Mohamed Hassan_ICRJ-7-365-1.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients after acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been shown to be a strong predictor of short-and long-term mortality. It has also been recognized that DM is associated with an increased rate of post-infarction heart failure. Aim of the study: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on myocardial reperfusion after primary PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction utilizing, resolution of ST-segment elevation and myocardial blush grade (MBG) and To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on left ventricular remodeling using 2-D speckle tracking. Methods: The study population consisted of 100 patients with anterior STEMI (50 diabetic and 50 non diabetic) all patients underwent 1ry PCI. Conventional 2D echocardiography to asses LVEF, EDV and ESV and speckle tracking echocardiography to asses LV global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain was done within 72 h of admission and after 3 months later and patients with LV remodeling, i.e. an increase >20% in LV enddiastolic volume (LVEDV), were identified. Results: No significant difference was found regarding baseline clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic characteristics except in MBG3 (18% vs. 54% p = 0.001), MBG1 (32% vs. 8% p=0.003), complete ST segment resolution (18% vs. 48% p=0.001) and Absent ST segment resolution (28% vs. 10% p=0.022) between diabetics and non diabetics respectively. Despite a similar incidence of LV remodeling in DM and non DM groups (22% vs. 16%, p=0.444), The 19 patients with LV remodeling had significantly more impaired LVEDV (99.84 ± 19.24 vs. 125.11 ± 19.96, p=0.001), and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-11.47 ± 1.34% vs. -10.61 ± 2.15%, p=0.021). Change in end diastolic volume showed the strongest correlation with the GLS (P=0.042, r=0.473) and apical circumferential strain (P=0.028, r=0.014). Furthermore, apical circumferential strain demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy: area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with sensitivity 84.2% and specificity 88.9%, using a cutoff value >-11.7% and GLS with sensitivity 89.5% and specificity 65.4%, using a cutoff value >-12.5% for prediction of LV remodeling. Conclusion: Despite worse micro vascular reperfusion and ST segment resolution in STEMI patients with diabetes, the incidence of LV remodeling was similar compared to non-DM patients and LV apical CS and GLS is a predictive param¬eter of future adverse remodeling.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus