You are in:Home/Publications/Effectiveness of Interprofessional Education on Improvement of Learning Outcomes among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Meta-Analysis

Dr. Gihan Mohamed Mohamed Salem :: Publications:

Title:
Effectiveness of Interprofessional Education on Improvement of Learning Outcomes among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Meta-Analysis
Authors: Shimmaa Mansour Moustafa Mohamed, Puvaneswari Kanagaraj, Sudha Annasaheb Raddi, Raghad Almushawah, Nehal Demerdash, and Gihan Mohamed Mohamed Salem
Year: 2025
Keywords: simulation-based interprofessional education (IPE), undergraduate nursing students, nursing education intervention, collaborative practice, self-efficacy, teamwork, communication skills, meta-analysis
Journal: SAGE Open Nursing
Volume: 11
Issue: Not Available
Pages: 10
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background In today's complex healthcare environment, nurses do not work in isolation. Successful patient outcomes depend on seamless collaboration among nurses, doctors, pharmacists, and other professionals. Interprofessional education (IPE) ensures that future nurses are equipped with the teamwork, communication, and decision-making skills necessary for delivering safe and effective patient care. Despite its recognized importance, studies reveal mixed results on the effectiveness of IPE, particularly among nursing students. Objectives This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of IPE on key learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students, focusing on teamwork, communication, self-efficacy, and professional attitudes, compared to traditional education methods. Methods A systematic search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PMC databases, yielding 1,665 studies. Following screening and eligibility assessment, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on intervention type, sample size, and primary learning outcomes. Effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model to account for variability. This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results The pooled effect size (Cohen's d = 0.46, p 

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus