You are in:Home/Publications/Photoxicity of Rose Bengal against the Camel Tick Hyalomma dromedarii.

Prof. Hanem Khater :: Publications:

Title:
Photoxicity of Rose Bengal against the Camel Tick Hyalomma dromedarii.
Authors: Khater, H.F. and Hendawy N.I.
Year: 2016
Keywords: Hyalomma dromedarii Ivermectin Malformation Reproductive potential Rose Bengal
Journal: International Journal of Veterinary Science
Volume: 3
Issue: 2
Pages: 78-86.
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Hanem Fathi Khater_Hyalomma.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Hyalomma dromedarii is the predominant tick species infesting camels. Consequently, the aims of the present study were to compare the photodynamic efficacy of rose bengal (RB) to that of ivermectin (IVR) against the engorged females of H. dromedarii through in vitro immersion bioassays and to test the effect of the applied materials on the reproductive potential of the survived females. RB has been tried as acaricides for the first time, to the best of our knowledge. Different concentrations of RB (0.01, 0.03, 0.13, 0.5 and 2%) and IVR (0.02, 0.08, 0.6, 2.5, and 10%) were freshly prepared in distilled water. The minimal lethal concentrations that cause 100% acaricidal effect were 2%, 8 h post treatment (PT) with RB, and 2.5%, 24 h PT with IVR. Eight hours PT with RB and IVR, the LC50 (lethal concentration, 50%) values were 0.08 and 0.35%, respectively, whereas those for LC95 were 1.45 and 30.07%, respectively. At the levels of LC50 and LC90, RB was 4 and 15 times more potent than IVR. The median lethal time, LT50, values of 2% RB and 2.5% IVR were 0.92 and 2.63 h, respectively. Treatment with the lowest concentrations of RB and IVR induced reduction in the number of survived and ovipositing females, eggs per female, ticks laid hatched eggs, and hatched eggs (48.98, 93.33, 1854.53±45, 97.5 and 93.64%) and (26.53, 86.67, 7661.27±377, 87.80 and 89.40%), respectively. The low cost of RB, together with the availability of inexpensive low-power light sources or sunshine, suggests that this approach is of great potential as an interesting alternative to chemical acaricides.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus