You are in:Home/Publications/Short-term Surgical and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse

Prof. Hussein Gamal Elgohary :: Publications:

Title:
Short-term Surgical and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Management of Complete Rectal Prolapse
Authors: Mostafa B. Abdulwahab (MD), Hussein Elgohary (MD),
Year: 2017
Keywords: Complete rectal prolapse, Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, Functional outcome, Quality of Life.
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Hussein Gamal Elgohary_Rectopexy.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: There is no clear treatment of choice for the problem of complete rectal prolapse. The treatment of CRP in adults is essentially surgical. Surgical management is aimed at restoring physiology by correcting the prolapse and improving continence and constipation with acceptable mortality and recurrence rates Objectives: To determine the safety and outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) for the management of CRP patients. Patients & Methods: The study included 33 CRP patients; 20 females and 13 males. Females were significantly obese than males; however, males were significantly older. Four females had associated vaginal vault prolapse. All patients underwent LVMR. Surgical outcome included intraoperative (IO), postoperative (PO) and follow-up data. Functional outcome was assessed at 6-m and 12-m PO and compared versus preoperative evaluation for severity of fecal incontinence (FI) using Vaizey score, frequency and severity of constipation using Cleveland Clinic Constipation (CCC) score and impact of FI on patient's quality of life (QOL) using the Fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL) score (11). Results: All patients passed smooth uneventful operative and immediate postoperative course. No patient required conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time was 151.9±31.6 (range: 120-240 min) and mean amount of IO blood loss was 75.2±16 (range: 50-130 ml). Laparoscopic surgery provided its usual advantages concerning low PO pain score, and early ambulation, oral intake, and hospital discharge. Only three patients (9.1%) developed immediate PO complications. All patients showed significant functional improvement manifested as a significant decrease of Vaizey FI and CCC scores with a significant increase of FIOL score at 6-m PO and these scorings were progressively improved till 12-m PO. Throughout 12 months PO follow-up; two female patients developed recurrent rectal prolapse for a frequency of 6.1%. Conclusion: LVMR is a safe procedure for management of CRP within reasonable operative time and with minimal immediate PO morbidities. LVMR provided significant improvement of CRP-associated FI and constipation and its impact on patients QOL. LVMR is associated with low frequency of PO recurrence throughout 12-m follow-up.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus