You are in:Home/Publications/Clinical Outcome of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with STEMI with Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Randomization Study

Dr. marwa kamal mahmoud el sayed :: Publications:

Title:
Clinical Outcome of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with STEMI with Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Randomization Study
Authors: Marwa Kamal Mahmoud1,Mohammed abdo Salem1,Amr abdelmordy elsayed1,Shaimaa Mostafa Mohamed 2,Basant Samy Zahid1,Karim Hamed Elakabawy1
Year: 2026
Keywords: Keywords: STEMI; Dapagliflozin; Left Ventricular Remodeling; Heart Failure; Global Longitudinal Strain; SGLT2i .
Journal: Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper marwa kamal mahmoud el sayed_RMRN870.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background:ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) survivors face a significant residual risk of developing heart failure (HF) owing to maladaptive left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are established pillars of care for chronic HF.Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective, randomized, single-center trial, enrolled 104 patients with confirmed STEMI and randomized them to be treated with either dapagliflozin (DAPA) 10 mg daily (n=73) or a matching placebo (n=31), in addition to standard guideline directed therapy. Echocardiographic parameters, including LV Ejection Fraction (LVEF), Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), and LV volumes, were assessed. All patients were assessed at the following time points: baseline (at admission), 30 days, and following 6 months.Results: At the 6-month follow up, patients treated with DAPA exhibited superior cardiac function, with higher median LVEF (50% vs. 45%, p=0.002) and improved GLS (-12.0% vs. -10.9%, p=0.022). Notably, adverse LV remodeling was prevented entirely in the dapagliflozin group (0%) relative to 100% in the placebo group (p

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus