You are in:Home/Publications/RE-EVALUATION OF THE GIGANTIC TITANOSAURIAN SAUROPOD DINOSAUR PARALITITAN STROMERI FROM THE MIDCRETACEOUS BAHARIYA FORMATION OF EGYPT AND ITS PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER EXCEPTIONALLY LARGE TITANOSAURS

Ass. Lect. Belal Shehta Fathy Rezk Salem :: Publications:

Title:
RE-EVALUATION OF THE GIGANTIC TITANOSAURIAN SAUROPOD DINOSAUR PARALITITAN STROMERI FROM THE MIDCRETACEOUS BAHARIYA FORMATION OF EGYPT AND ITS PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER EXCEPTIONALLY LARGE TITANOSAURS
Authors: Eric Gorscak, Matthew Lamanna, Belal S. Salem, Sanaa El-Sayed, Hesham M. Sallam
Year: 2023
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 83 Annual Meeting
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: 189
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

In 2001, the giant titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur Paralititan stromeri was described from the midCretaceous (Cenomanian) Bahariya Formation of Egypt. Despite the incompleteness of the holotype (Egyptian Geological Museum [CGM] 81119), the 1.69 m humerus of Paralititan indicated the presence of an extraordinarily large-bodied titanosaurian on the African continent, rivaling in size those known from the Americas at the time (e.g., Argentinosaurus, Alamosaurus). Since then, several enormous new titanosaurians have been described from the mid– Late Cretaceous of South America (e.g., Dreadnoughtus, Futalognkosaurus, Notocolossus, Patagotitan), as have several other African Late Cretaceous titanosaurs (e.g., Mansourasaurus, Rukwatitan). Following from these discoveries, recent analyses have proposed the existence of certain clades of often gigantic titanosaurians (e.g., Colossosauria, Lognkosauria). Paralititan, however, has been omitted from these analyses, most likely due to its fragmentary nature and the brevity of its published description. Here we provide an updated assessment of the evolutionary relationships of Paralititan to test whether this taxon belongs to one of the aforementioned clades of exceptionally large titanosaurs. We re-evaluated and updated the scorings of Paralititan in our working phylogenetic dataset and conducted both parsimony and tip-dating Bayesian phylogenetic analyses (57 taxa scored for 285 variable and 302 autapomorphic characters). Our parsimony results postulate Paralititan as the sister taxon of Rukwatitan, with this African clade being the outgroup to a clade of generally large titanosaurs that consist mainly of forms widely regarded as lognkosaurians plus a clade of taxa with a biconvex first caudal vertebra (e.g., Alamosaurus, Dreadnoughtus). The tip-dating Bayesian analysis produced similar results, except that Rukwatitan was recovered within Lognkosauria, with Patagotitan and Paralititan being successive outgroups to this clade. Furthermore, the Late Cretaceous ingroup clade to the exclusion of Paralititan consists of the smallbodied Saltasauridae and several small–mediumsized titanosaurians from Afro-Eurasia (e.g., Mansourasaurus) amongst Colossosauria and the ‘biconvex first caudal clade.’ The latter results support the notion that, on continental Africa, multiple titanosaurian lineages underwent trends toward either larger or smaller body sizes, paralleling a pattern seen in the Late Cretaceous of South America.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus