You are in:Home/Publications/Comparison between Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostatic Biopsy versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostatic Guided Target Biopsy in Suspected Cancer Prostate Patients

Dr. Mohamed Abdel_rahman Alhefnawy :: Publications:

Title:
Comparison between Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostatic Biopsy versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostatic Guided Target Biopsy in Suspected Cancer Prostate Patients
Authors: Mohamed Alhefnawy;Ahmed Abou-Taleb;Waleed El-Shaer; Abdel-Monaem Mohamed*,Ahmed Mohey,Abdallah Fathi
Year: 2024
Keywords: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy;mpMRI;Prostate cancer.
Journal: The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Volume: 95
Issue: April 2024
Pages: 1521-1549
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Mohamed Abdel_rahman Alhefnawy_EJHM_Volume 95_Issue 1_Pages 1542-1549 (1).pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Prostate cancer (PCA) is the most frequent cancer among men. In order to overcome the practical limitations ofprostatespecific antigen(PSA)screening, research in recent years has focused on developing more precise imaging techniques.Objectives:This study aimed todetermine the function of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)as a prebiopsy imaging decreasing the number of biopsies taken and role of combination of mpMRI finding withstandardtransrectal ultrasound (TRUS)guided biopsyfindingsto improve efficacy of standard TRUS biopsy.Patients and methods:This prospective study trial was completed on 124 patients suspicious for cancer prostate as elevated total PSA > 10 ng/ml or in grey zone and free/total ratio less than 0.18 or suspicious digital rectal examination who attended to the Urology Department of Benha University Hospital. All patients underwent mpMRI then TRUS guided systematic biopsy. Further to that, TRUS guided targeted biopsy by cognitive biopsy technique from suspicious lesions in the same session for those who hadpositive mpMRI finding.Results: Regarding the agreement and performance characteristics between combined systematic and targeted biopsyin relation to systematic biopsyalone among patients suspected of having prostate cancer, showed moderate agreement (k=0.499), with 73.2 % sensitivity, 77.3 % specificity, 80.4 % PPV, 69.4 % NPV and 75.0 % accuracy.Conclusions: Combined TRUS guided and Targeted biopsy improvedcancer detection rate in patients with PIRADs 2, 3, 4.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus