You are in:Home/Publications/Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study

Dr. Mohamed Gamal Abdelmoez Masoud :: Publications:

Title:
Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study
Authors: Awwad, Mohamed ; Elhadad, Mona ; Masoud, Mohamed
Year: 2024
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Volume: 117
Issue: 3
Pages: 202-216
Publisher: Wolters kluwer
Local/International: Local
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Objectives To assess Dexmedetomidine’s effect as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in patients with glaucoma undergoing cataract extraction surgery via optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). Participants Thirty-nine glaucoma participants planned for phacoemulsification were allocated into two groups. A 10 ml mixture of peribulbar anesthesia was administered to group I. This anesthetic mixture consisted of 4.5 ml of lidocaine 2% mixed with 4.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%,1 ml of dexmedetomidine (50 µg), and 150 IU hyaluronidase. Group II was administered a peribulbar anesthetic mixture consisting of 4.5 ml of lidocaine 2% combined with 4.5 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%,150 IU of hyaluronidase, and 1 ml of normal saline, totaling 10 ml. Optical coherence tomography angiography was used 10 mi before and 10 min after injection to scan optic disc total vessel density, foveal superficial deep capillary plexuses (DCP) density, radial peripapillary capillary network density, and total vessel density plus foveal avascular zone (FAZ) diameter. We also checked the intraocular pressure (IOP) before and 10 min after the anesthetic injection. Results After the administration of the peribulbar anesthetic, group II demonstrated a notably higher significance in the DCP fovea median percent change (–43.7%) compared with group I (-2%) (P

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus