You are in:Home/Publications/Analgesic Efficacy of Preemptive Intra-articular Injection of Bupivacaine alone versus Bupivacaine in Combination with Tramadol or Neostigmine

Dr. Mohamed Mahmoud Ali Khamis :: Publications:

Title:
Analgesic Efficacy of Preemptive Intra-articular Injection of Bupivacaine alone versus Bupivacaine in Combination with Tramadol or Neostigmine
Authors: MOHAMMED MAHMOUD A. KHAMIS MD
Year: 2006
Keywords: Intra-articular, tramadol, neostigmine
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Mohamed Mahmoud Ali Khamis_d.mahmoud .docx
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

The present comparative study was designed to evaluate the postoperative (PO) analgesia of preemptive intra-articular (IA) injection of neostigmine or tramadol in comparison to bupivacaine in patients undergoing therapeutic knee arthroscopy. The study included 60 patients (31 males and. 19 females; 53 patients were ASA I and 7 patients were ASA II). Patients were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups according to IA medication used; Neostigmine group received 500 ug neostigmine plus BupivacaineO.25%,Tramadol group received 100 mg tramadol plus BupivacineO.25% and Bupivacaine group received30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine; all medications were injected 3D-minutes prior to skin incision. Arrival at the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) was recorded as time zero. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); a 100-mm scale included 0 as an indication of "no pain at all", and 100 as an indication of "the worst possible pain" at 1,4,8, 12, and 24 hours after operation. Duration of effective analgesia was measured from the time o (T-O) until first use of analgesic rescue medication at VAS score 2:40 and the total amount of analgesic rescue medication was assessed over 24h. Combination of tramadol or neostigmine with bupivacaine provided significantly superior PO analgesia in comparison to bupivacaine only manifested as longer duration of PO analgesia and lower pain VAS scores extending till 12-hrswith neostigmine and 24- hrs with tramadol in comparison to only 4-hrs PO analgesia with bupivacaine with a significant reduction of requests for and dose of rescue analgesia in neostigmine and tramadol groups, compared to bupivacaine group. Tramadol provided more profound analgesic effect than neostigmine manifested as significantly longer duration of analgesia compared to bupivacaine or neostigmine groups. Mean of total VAS score recorded in neostigmine and tramadol groups was significantly lower compared to that recorded in bupivacaine group with a non-significant difference in favor of tramado!. There were no differences between the studied groups regarding the frequency of PO adverse effects throughout the follow-up period. In conclusion, preemptive intra-articular analgesia is an effective postoperative pain control modality and combination therapy is more effective than bupivacaine alone. Combination of tramadol and bupivacaine provided superior postoperative analgesia and spares rescue analgesia consumption.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus