You are in:Home/Publications/Comparative retrospective study between using mesh or not in iliostomy closure as a preventive method for incisional hernia

Dr. mohammed farid abdelhalim mustafa :: Publications:

Title:
Comparative retrospective study between using mesh or not in iliostomy closure as a preventive method for incisional hernia
Authors: Mahmoud Abdelbaky Mahmoud,1 Mohamed F. Abdelhalim,2 Ahmed Gamal Eldin Osman1
Year: 2022
Keywords: Incisional hernia, Iliosomy closure, Mesh repair
Journal: The Egyptian Journal of Surgery
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper mohammed farid abdelhalim mustafa_Paper Design.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background and Aims: Stomal site incisional hernia is a complication following ileostomy closure, with rates about 40%. Because there were no previous studies undergone to find a definite solution for it. Different preventive methods was studied to decrease the incidence of post-ileostomy closure incisional hernia. One of these methods was the usage of prophylactic mesh reinforcement mode of absorbable poliglecaprone monofilament fiber and non-absorbable polypropylene monofilament fiber) during ileostomy closure and study its role in prevention of stomal site incisional hernia without increasing the incidence of wound complications. Aim of the work: Evaluating the importance of prophylactic mesh reinforcement during closure of ileostomy to prevent stomal site incisional hernia. Methods: This was a retrospective study, included 40 Egyptian patients presenting for ileostomy closure. Half of them without mesh and the other half applied mesh at ileostomy site during closure. Patients of the two groups underwent ileostomy closure between February 2018 and March 2020 and then they had been assessed in the following two years for the occurrence of postoperative incisional hernias. Results: Regarding the incidence of incisional hernia, 10 out of 40 patients (25%) in the current study developed incisional hernias. In group B (without mesh reinforcement) 8 patients (40.0%) developed incisional hernias, while in group A (with mesh reinforcement) 2 patients (10.0%) developed incisional hernias. Although there was trend for developing incisional hernia in patients without mesh reinforcement and the study shows significant result of incisional hernia reduction with mesh reinforcement during the first six months after closure (p=0.035), prophylactic mesh repair significantly reduce that incidence in the total follow-up period of the two years (p=0.028). Conclusion: The study shows significant decrease of incisional hernia with mesh reinforcement during the first six months after closure. However, in the total follow-up period of the two years prophylactic mesh repair significantly reduce post-ileostomy closure incidence of incisional hernia, without significantly increasing the incidence of wound infection.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus