You are in:Home/Publications/An Efficient Heap Based Optimizer Algorithm for Feature Selection

Dr. mona abdelbaset :: Publications:

Title:
An Efficient Heap Based Optimizer Algorithm for Feature Selection
Authors: Mona AS Ali, Fathimathul Rajeena PP, Abd Elminaam, Diaa Salama
Year: 2022
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Mathematics
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

The heap-based optimizer (HBO) is an innovative meta-heuristic inspired by human social behavior. In this research, binary adaptations of the heap-based optimizer B _ H B O are presented and used to determine the optimal features for classifications in wrapping form. In addition, HBO balances exploration and exploitation by employing self-adaptive parameters that can adaptively search the solution domain for the optimal solution. In the feature selection domain, the presented algorithms for the binary Heap-based optimizer B _ H B O are used to find feature subsets that maximize classification performance while lowering the number of selected features. The textitk-nearest neighbor (textitk-NN) classifier ensures that the selected features are significant. The new binary methods are compared to eight common optimization methods recently employed in this field, including Ant Lion Optimization (ALO), Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (AOA), Backtracking Search Algorithm (BSA), Crow Search Algorithm (CSA), Levy flight distribution (LFD), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Slime Mold Algorithm (SMA), and Tree Seed Algorithm (TSA) in terms of fitness, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F-score, the number of selected features, and statistical tests. Twenty datasets from the UCI repository are evaluated and compared using a set of evaluation indicators. The non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine whether the proposed algorithms’ results varied statistically significantly from those of the other compared methods.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus