You are in:Home/Publications/ Efficacy of different entomopathogenic nematode isolates, against the peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saund.) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Dr. Naglaa Fekry Abd El-Hamed :: Publications:

Title:
Efficacy of different entomopathogenic nematode isolates, against the peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata (Saund.) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Authors: Radwa F. Sallam1*, Fawzy F. Shalaby2, Adel A. Hafez2, Naglaa F. Abdel‑Hameid2 and Souad A. Shairra1
Year: 2024
Keywords: Keywords Peach fruit fly, Bactrocera zonata, Entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, H. indica, Efficacy
Journal: Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control
Volume: 34:12
Issue: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-024-00774-8
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Naglaa Fekry Abd El-Hamed_Nematode.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Abstract Background The invasive peach fruit fly (PFF), Bactrocera zonata (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae), is a native of South east Asia. Entomopathogens like nematodes, bacteria, viruses and fungi have been shown to be effective as a biologi cal control agent against B. zonata. Evaluation the efficacy of different entomopathogenic nematode isolates (EPNs) belonged to the two families (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae); (Steinernema carpocapsae (AII), S. carpocap sae (EGAZ10), Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HP88) and H. indica (EGAZ2) was carried out against the full‑grown larvae of B. zonata under laboratory, semi‑field and field conditions. Results Data revealed that in all the tested nematode isolates succeeded to reduce the emerging of the PFF, B. zonata compared to controls with significant differences. The LC50 values were 794.3, 1063.2, 1249.8 and 1446.8 IJs/ml, for S. carpocapsae (AII), S. carpocapsae (EGAZ10), H. bacteriophora (HP88) and H. indica (EGAZ2), respectively, at 3 days post treatments. The strain, S. carpocapsae (AII) was effective than S. carpocapsae (EGAZ10). Also, the strain H. bacterio phora (HP88) was more effective than H. indica (EGAZ2). Therefore, the combination between the effective two stein ernematid strains (S. carpocapsae (AII) & S. carpocapsae (EGAZ10)) and the two heterorhabditis strains (H. bacteriophora (HP88) & H. indica (EGAZ2)) was efficient in the semi‑field experiment. In field condition, the combination of the two efficient strains S. carpocapsae (AII) and H. bacteriophora (HP88) at the concentration of 3000 IJs/ml was more effective in controlling B. zonata causing mortality 97.5%. The Co‑Toxicity factor values were − 67.6 for the combination of S. carpocapsae (AII) with S. carpocapsae (EGAZ10) which recorded an antagonistic effect. Also, antagonistic effects were observed for the combined application of H. bacteriophora (HP88) with H. indica (EGAZ2) (− 66.6) in semi‑field applica tion; and the same effect was recorded for the combination of S. carpocapsae (AII) with H. bacteriophora (HP88) (− 42.6) in field application. Conclusion All EPNs’ experiments showed that the efficacy of foreign nematodes than the local ones. So, combina tion of the two highly effective imported strains gave satisfied results, especially in the field experiment.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus