You are in:Home/Publications/Microneedling System Alone versus Microneedling System with Trichloroacetic Acid in the Management of Abdominal Striae Rubra: a clinical and histopathological study

Prof. Neveen Emad Ali :: Publications:

Title:
Microneedling System Alone versus Microneedling System with Trichloroacetic Acid in the Management of Abdominal Striae Rubra: a clinical and histopathological study
Authors: Neveen emad Sorour, Eman Mostafa Sanad. Hala Adel Agena .
Year: 2015
Keywords: dermaroller, microneedling, striae rubra, trichloroacetic acid
Journal: Journal of the Egyptian Women
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background Striae distensae or stretch marks, although not a health risk, are of significant cosmetic concern as it affects the patient’s psychological condition. Although many treatment modalities have been attempted with variable results, there is no standard treatment modality for it. Objective:The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of a microneedling system (dermaroller) when used alone or combined with 15–30% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in the management of striae rubra. Patients and methods: This clinical trial included 30 female patients with abdominal striae rubra treated with a dermaroller alone on the left side of the abdomen (GI) and with a dermaroller+15–30% TCA on the right side of the abdomen (GII). Patients were treated for six sessions at 3-week intervals. We assessed the clinical features (length, width, color, and texture) of striae in each group at every session and 3 weeks after the end of the sessions (follow-up). The response to treatment was assessed objectively by the treating physicians at every session and skin biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin and picrosirius red stains. Subjective assessment of the clinical photographs and patient satisfaction scores was carried out by two uninvolved blind dermatologists at every session. Results A comparison between GI and GII at the follow-up session revealed statistically significant differences in length (P=0.002), width (P

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus