You are in:Home/Publications/Carvedilol versus Urolithin A as a hepatoprotective agent against Thioacetamide induced liver fibrosis in adult male albino rats (Histological and Immunohistochemical study)

Dr. Omaima Refaat Mohamed Elsayed :: Publications:

Title:
Carvedilol versus Urolithin A as a hepatoprotective agent against Thioacetamide induced liver fibrosis in adult male albino rats (Histological and Immunohistochemical study)
Authors: Amal G. Metwally1, Omima R. Mohamed2, Salwa A.Z.A Ahmed3, Afnan I.Elgndy4 , Hanan I. EL-kerdasy5 and Marian V. Zaki
Year: 2026
Keywords: Thioacetamide, Urolithin A, carvedilol, (PCNA), (α- SMA), hepatic fibrosis.
Journal: Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal,
Volume: 25 No.2,
Issue: 2
Pages: 222-232
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Omaima Refaat Mohamed Elsayed_Research6.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background The prevalence of liver fibrosis has increased. It is defined as the reaction to the chronic injury of the liver by which the hepatic parenchymal cell is distorted and replaced by extracellular matrix. Objective To investigate the probable therapeutic properties of Carvedilol and Urolithin A on liver fibrosis evedinced by thioacetamide (TAA) in rats. Materials and methods The study was conducted on 36 mature male albino rats which was distributed in four groups (nine rats each): The control group, (TAA) group, which received 200 mg/kg of (TAA) by (Ip) injection three times a week, Urolithin A group, received both (TAA) and urolithin A solution (50 mg/kg) by (Ip) injection every day, and Carvedilol group, given (TAA) and carvedilol (10 mg/kg) orally. All treatments were given for eight weeks. Serum concentrations of (AST), (ALT), and (ALP) were determined and the histopathological and immunohistochemical staining were used to evaluate the hepatic tissues. Results and conclusion TAA-treated rats showed pathological hepatic damage and substantial elevations in serum liver enzymes and hepatic malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration. Additionally, it reduced the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in the liver tissue. When urolithin A or carvedilol were given in combination with (TAA), they markedly diminished the (MDA) concentration in the liver tissues and the serum liver enzymes while augmenting the activity of the liver tissue’s (SOD) and (CAT). The histopathological and biochemical alterations prompted by (TAA) administration were ameliorated under the influence of Urolithin A and Carvedilol. Carvedilol exhibited a significantly superior hepatoprotective and anti-fibrotic effect compared to Urolithin A.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus