You are in:Home/Publications/Percutaneous Fixation For Pediatric Humeral Lateral Condyle Fractures.

Prof. Osama Eisawy :: Publications:

Title:
Percutaneous Fixation For Pediatric Humeral Lateral Condyle Fractures.
Authors: Ahmed Shawkat Rizk M.D, Osama M. Essawy M.D
Year: 2017
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Osama Eisawy_paper 6.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: Traditionally, the initially non-displaced pediatric humeral lateral condyle fractures (PHLCFs) were treated conservatively while displaced or rotated fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Late displacement and nonunion were reported in some conservatively treated cases meanwhile, epiphyseal necrosis with or without non-union and elbow deformity were reported in some cases treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Few studies highlighted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) for displaced and/or rotated fractures. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of closed reduction and percutaneous fixation for the treatment of pediatric humeral lateral condyle fractures. Patients and Methods: A prospective study included 45 cases of pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures (PLHCFs) that were pre-operatively classified according to Song et al classification; all cases were planned to have percutaneous fixation either in situ pinning if initially non-displaced or after closed reduction if displaced or rotated. If closed reduction failed, ORIF was done. The functional results were evaluated according to the modified Aggarwal et al. criteria. Results: Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) was successful in 80.48% of cases with displaced and /or rotated fractures with satisfactory clinical and radiological results and no reported surgery-related complications in any case till the last follow-up with a mean follow-up duration 18.6 ± 3.04 months, ORIF was done in only 8 cases (representing 19.52% of the studied cases) after failed closed reduction. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in the mean radiological union time and the mean time needed for restoration of the full functional capacity of the operated elbow between cases treated by CRPF and cases treated by ORIF. Conclusions: Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) could be the treatment of choice for potentially unstable lateral humeral condyle fractures avoiding the complications of late displacement and elbow stiffness reported in some conservatively treated case. CRPF is an efficient and minimally invasive treatment option for some displaced and/or rotated fractures with very satisfactory clinical and radiological results. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) could be restricted only for certain complex cases or after the failure of CRPF.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus