You are in:Home/Publications/Reconstruction Methods After Pancreaticoduodenectomy For Pancreatic Carcinoma; Which Better To Prevent Serious Complications

Dr. Refaat salama salama ahmed :: Publications:

Title:
Reconstruction Methods After Pancreaticoduodenectomy For Pancreatic Carcinoma; Which Better To Prevent Serious Complications
Authors: Hamed Rashad,a MD; El-Sayed A. Abd El-Mabood, a MD; Taher H. Elwan, a MD; Ayman M. Adbelmofeed, a MD; Refaat S. Salama, a MD; Emad H. Gad, b MD;
Year: 2014
Keywords: Pancreatic carcinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, pancreaticojejunostomy, morbidity.
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Refaat salama salama ahmed_Reconstruction Methods After Pancreaticoduodenectomy For Pancreatic Carcinoma; Which Better To Prevent Serious Complications.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Purposes: The aim of this study was to assess the safety of the pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) & to compare the results of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a prospective and randomized setting. Background: Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy represents a critical trigger of potentially life-threatening complications and is also associated with markedly prolonged hospitalization. The best method for dealing with the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains in question. Patients and methods: The study included 50 patients; 33 (64%) males and 18 (36%) females with mean age of 66.3+4 years. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, laboratory assessment and CT or MRI examination. All patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with soft residual tissue were randomized to receive either pancreaticogastrostomy (group PG) or end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (group PJ). The postoperative follow up ranged from 6 months to 12 months. Results: No mortality were recorded. Mean ICU stay duration was 2.4+0.8 days. The duration of hospital & ICU stay was shorter in group PG (P-value =0.03); The mortality due to surgical causes was higher in group PJ (P-value =0.02); The frequency of post operative complications i.e. pancreatic fistula (P-value =0.0343), intra-abdominal bleeding & collection (P-value =0.0376) were higher in group PJ; But there is no significance between both groups in the frequency of Abdominal wall abscess & biliary leakage (P-value =0.39). The cases of Intra-abdominal collection were treated well by conservative measures in group PG (P-value =0.023); But cases that needed open drainage were less (P-value =0.0376) & there was no significance between both groups in CT guided drainage (P-value =0.56). Conclusions: Pancreaticogastrostomy could be considered better as a reconstruction method; with shorter hospital stay, No Necrosis of pancreatic remnant, Less frequency of post operative complications & So Re-do with its complication is also less.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus