You are in:Home/Publications/Evaluation of versatility of superiorly based pedicled gastrocnemius myo- or myo-cutaneous flap, in upper leg defects after trauma or tumor excision; which better?

Dr. Refaat salama salama ahmed :: Publications:

Title:
Evaluation of versatility of superiorly based pedicled gastrocnemius myo- or myo-cutaneous flap, in upper leg defects after trauma or tumor excision; which better?
Authors: Ayman M. Adbelmofeed, a MD; El-Sayed A. Abd El-Mabood, a MD; Refaat S. Salama, a MD;El Sayed M. Bayomy, b MD;
Year: 2014
Keywords: Trauma, Malignancy, tibial defect, gastrocnemius flaps.
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Refaat salama salama ahmed_Reconstruction Methods After Pancreaticoduodenectomy For Pancreatic Carcinoma; Which Better To Prevent Serious Complications.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Purposes: The current study aimed to focus on versatility of superiorly based pedicled gastrocnemius muscle flap or myocutaneous flap either medial or lateral head, in upper leg defects after trauma or tumor excision and importance of these flaps to improve bone healing in trauma & ensure adequate safety margin in malignant tumors with minimal complications. Patients and methods: A prospective, randomized trial was conducted to Twenty-seven patients suffering from upper leg defects after trauma or tumor excision to compare postoperative outcomes especially bone healing with the use of superiorly based pedicled gastrocnemius muscle flap covered by split thierch skin graft (Group A; 14 (51.8%)) versus myocutaneous flap (Group B; 13 (48.2%) cases),either medial or lateral head. Postoperative follow up was for 6 months. Results: Rapid healing of tibial fracture was noticed in 8 (57.1%) cases of group A & another 8 (61.5%) cases of group B within 2 weeks after surgery & there was no flap loss apart from partial skin loss, minor hematomas or infections; All were noticed significantly more in group A; 5 (35.7%), 6 (42.9%), 4 (28.6%) cases; But in group B; one case (8%), 2 (15.4%), one case (8%) respectively (P-Value

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus