You are in:Home/Publications/AXILLARY VERSUS INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK

Dr. Sameh Mohamed Rashad Nashy :: Publications:

Title:
AXILLARY VERSUS INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK
Authors: sameh mohamed rashad
Year: 2008
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: International
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Sameh Mohamed Rashad Nashy_Results.doc
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Regional anesthesia has more to offer in orthopedic surgery than in any other surgical specialty. This study was conducted on 180 patients of ASA physical status I-II presenting for surgery of the hand, forearm or elbow. Patients were randomly allocated into two main groups: Group A: In this group, double injection axillary brachial plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator was performed on 90 patients. Group B: In this group, single injection coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator was performed on 90 patients. In conclusion, the double injection axillary and single injection coracoid infraclavicular blocks have been proven to be useful, simple, safe and reliable. All the operative procedures of the hand, forearm and elbow can be performed with either technique. In comparison with double injection axillary block; single injection coracoid infraclavicular approach proved to be as safe and reliable, however it is superior in many aspects. The addition of clonidine to ropivacaine prolonged the duration of sensory block, postoperative analgesia and motor block.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus