You are in:Home/Publications/Exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a hybrid combined locomotive powering system for rail transportation

Ass. Lect. Shaimaa Fouad Mohammed Abdelhamid Ibrahim Seyam :: Publications:

Title:
Exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a hybrid combined locomotive powering system for rail transportation
Authors: Shaimaa Seyam; Ibrahim Dincer; Martin Agelin-Chaab Clean
Year: 2021
Keywords: Rail Transportation; Fuel cells; Alternative fuels; Exergy; Exergoeconomic analysis; Exergoenvironmental analysis; Hydrogen
Journal: Energy Conversion and Management
Volume: 245
Issue: August
Pages: 114619
Publisher: Elsevier
Local/International: International
Paper Link:
Full paper Shaimaa Fouad Mohammed Abdelhamid Ibrahim Seyam_1-s2.0-S0196890421007950-main.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Alternative and clean powering options are recognized as a crucial step in making rail transportation environmentally-benign, efficient and sustainable. This paper presents the exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a new hybrid locomotive powering system, consisting of an internal combustion engine, molten carbonate fuel cell, gas turbine, and absorption refrigeration system. Five alternative fuels are selected and considered with different concentrations, such as natural gas, methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether, and hydrogen. The entire system achieves a high exergetic efficiency of 83% with a total exergy destruction of 17 MW. The system components have a total levelized capital cost of 32.15 $/h and component-related envi- ronmental impact of 86 mPt/h. The entire system has a specific exergy cost and specific environmental impact of 0.10$/GJ and 69.4 mPt/MJ, respectively. It has the total exergoeconomic and environmental impact factors of 3.7% and 0.015%, and the relative cost and environmental impact differences of 21.9% and 19.4%, respectively. The fuel blend of 75% pure natural gas and 25% hydrogen is found to be the most cost effective option with the least environmental impact, compared to other alternative fuel blends.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus