You are in:Home/Publications/Intraoperative Placement of the Non-Hormonal Copper Intrauterine Devices in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

Dr. Shreen Naguib Abuelzz Moclely :: Publications:

Title:
Intraoperative Placement of the Non-Hormonal Copper Intrauterine Devices in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
Authors: Moharram Abd El-Hasseb Abd El-Hay, Yehia Samir Edris, Mohamed Abd El-Rahman El-Assal * and Shreen N Abuelezz.
Year: 2024
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Shreen Naguib Abuelzz Moclely_Mohamed El-Assal - Manscript plag - 10-3-2024 (1).docx
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a popular contraceptive option for women worldwide. While traditionally inserted postpartum, there is growing interest in intraoperative placement during cesarean delivery as a convenient and effective strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-hormonal copper IUD insertion during cesarean sections and compare outcomes with postpartum insertion. Methods: This prospective case-control study enrolled women aged 18-45 years undergoing cesarean section at Benha University's Obstetrics & Gynecology department from June 2021 to June 2023. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 (intrapartum) received IUD insertion during cesarean section, and Group 2 (postpartum) received insertion six weeks after discharge. Results: Of the 130 women assessed, 104 met inclusion criteria and were included in the study (Group 1: n=50, Group 2: n=54). There were no failed insertions in either group. Hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 after one week (9.3 vs. 10 g/dl, P=0.000) and six weeks (9.75 vs. 10.35 g/dl, P=0.0001). At six weeks, bleeding and IUD removal rates were 4% in Group 1 and 7.41% in Group 2 (P=0.457). Rates of expulsion were 2% in Group 1 and 3.7% in Group 2 (P=0.604). Displacement and removal rates were similar between groups (4% vs. 3.7%, P=0.937).

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus