You are in:Home/Publications/Assessment of The Results of Short Agonist Stop Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing ICSI Cycles

Dr. Yehia mohamed samir mohamed ahmed :: Publications:

Title:
Assessment of The Results of Short Agonist Stop Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing ICSI Cycles
Authors: Ahmed Fathy1, Yehia Mohamed Samir Edris2 and Heba E. Abdel Raziq3
Year: 2023
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link: Not Available
Full paper Yehia mohamed samir mohamed ahmed_7.pdf
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

Background: Poor ovarian response is defined as the collection of three or fewer oocytes in two prior ovarian stimulation cycles, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle from a woman who is over 40 years of age, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle and an abnormal ovarian reserve test. We aimed to determine if in poor responders’ patients, the SAS stimulation protocol allows for a better number of oocytes, mature oocytes, total embryos at D2 and usable embryos in comparison with the last previous IVF attempt within the same patients. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective observational study on 56 women aged ≥ 18 and < 43 years who undergo an IVF protocol with the “short agonist stop” (SAS) protocol compared with the same patients’ previous performance in their last IVF attempt. Enrolled patients were treated in two consecutive cycles. The first attempt was achieved with a standard protocol. Patients for whom the standard protocol has failed were treated in the subsequent cycle with the SAS protocol. Results: Regarding the cumulative outcomes, ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in SAS protocol compared to IVF protocol (0% vs. 12.5%, P=0.026). Number of cumulative ET, cancellation before oocyte pick, no usable embryo, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rate were insignificantly different between both protocols. Conclusion: The SAS stimulation protocol may offer promising results for poor responders with low prognosis and previous failed IVF.

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus