You are in:Home/Publications/A comparative study on the quality of plain and probiotic yoghurt

Prof. Ekbal Mohamed Adel Ibrahim :: Publications:

Title:
A comparative study on the quality of plain and probiotic yoghurt
Authors: Ekbal M. A. Ibrahim
Year: 2008
Keywords: Not Available
Journal: Not Available
Volume: Not Available
Issue: Not Available
Pages: Not Available
Publisher: Not Available
Local/International: Local
Paper Link:
Full paper Not Available
Supplementary materials Not Available
Abstract:

A total of 40 random samples of plain and probiotic yoghurt (20 of each) were collected from different markets in Kaliobia governorate to evaluate their quality. The sensory characteristic score of probiotic yoghurt (91.69± 7. 86) was significantly better than plain one (77.91 ± 8.16). The chemical examination indicated that the average values of pH and titratable acidity were 3.63 ± 0.07 & 0.91 ± 0.07 for plain yoghurt and 4.29 ± 0.05 & 0.72 ± 0.06 for probiotic yoghurt. On the other hand, the bacterial counts in the examined plain and probiotic yoghurt samples were 1.35 x 104 ± 0.22 x 104 and 2.12x103 ± 0.39 x 103 /g for aerobic spore formers count, 4.78 x 102 ± 0.61 x 102 and 1.31 x 102 ± 0.17102 /g for B.cereus count, 2.01 x 103 ± 0.34 x 103 and 4.73 x 102 ± 0.52 x 102 /g for staphylococci count and 7.24 x 102 ± 1.83 x 102 and 2.58 x 102 ± 0.41 x 102 /g for coliform ,respectively. Furthermore, B.cereus, B.circulans, B.coagulans, B.licheniformis, B.macerans, B.stearothermophilus, B.subtilis, S.aureus and S. epidermidis as well as micrococci were isolated from both plain and probiotic yoghurt with varying percentages. However, Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EEC) were isolated from 5% of plain yoghurt samples and serologically identified as O26: K60 (B6) and O128: K67 (B12). In contrast, all examined samples of probiotic yoghurt were free from E.E. coli. According to sensory, chemical and bacteriological results, probiotic yoghurt appeared to be better and safer for human consumption as compared with plain

Google ScholarAcdemia.eduResearch GateLinkedinFacebookTwitterGoogle PlusYoutubeWordpressInstagramMendeleyZoteroEvernoteORCIDScopus