Why workers feel frustrated despite their best efforts in the organization? Why aren't they getting an expected positive response? Is the perceived response consistent with the realize response? What the difference between perceived and real mutual interactive marginalization? What the difference between external and internal mutual interactive marginalization? All these questions are answered by this study, which focuses on interactive marginalization and its role in workers not obtaining the expected response and feeling frustrated and the difference between the external interactive marginalization (out-to-in), and the internal interactive marginalization (in-to-out) and difference between two parts, perceived and real marginalization with its eight patterns between organization and society and its effect of new comers and/or young doctors' psychological commitment, The first direction (out-to-in) including four types: (1)-perceived outside marginalization Switch to a perceived marginalization in. (2)-perceived outside marginalization leads to real marginalization in. (3)-real out marginalization move towards a real marginalization in. (4)-real out marginalization goes to a perceived marginalization in. The second direction (in-to-out) includes four types: (1)-perceived inside marginalization leads to perceived marginalization out. (2)-perceived inside marginalization switch to real marginalization out. (3)-real inside marginalization move towards perceived marginalization out. (4)-real inside marginalization goes to real marginalization out. research focused on studying the question about does interactive marginalization vs. psychological empowerment and psychological capital really affect the doctors' psychological commitment in educational hospitals? interactive marginalization as independent variable, psychological empowerment as an intermediate variable and psychological capital as a moderator variable in the relation between interactive marginalization (out-to-in & in-to-out) and psychological commitment. Through the results of exploratory study for researched public government schools and statistical analysis of a sample of (210) new and/or young doctors. Research based on four main hypotheses, while hypothesis (H3) included four sub-hypotheses. (H01) and (H02) hypothesis was refused. In contrast, (H3) and (H4) hypothesis was admitted (agreeable) collectively and Partially. Moreover, the study presenting some recommendations about supporting psychological empowerment and enhancing the psychological capital and activation of psychological commitment, Psychological Contract and emotional equilibrium. |
